STIFLING FAIRNESS IN A PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSROOM

One more story from Missouri:

Controversy erupted recently in Kirkwood, MO, an affluent suburb of St. Louis. At an evening meeting at Nipher Middle School designed to introduce parents to the school curriculum for the coming year, a Palestinian flag was prominently displayed on the wall of social studies teacher Jason Kipp's classroom. Although the Jewish population of Kirkwood is not large, it so happened that one parent in attendance was a descendant of Holocaust survivors, along with her daughter who was scheduled to be a student in Kipp's class (she was later removed). She asked if the flag of Israel could also be displayed, but Mr. Kipp refused, and then added fuel to the fire by making a remark to the lady about "your version of history." Understandably, the lady was upset and complained to the school administration. Since then, meetings have been held and school district administrators have attempted to address the conflict, but anger remains.

It is difficult to understand why a teacher of middle school students would refuse to allow students to learn about both sides of a controversy; if he is convinced that he is correct in his opinions, then he should have no fear of presenting an alternative viewpoint and allowing facts to speak for themselves (although one wonders at this point if the facts would be presented fairly). 

After the attacks of 9-11, the government and citizenry of the United States encouraged study of Islam in order to understand the thinking and real or perceived grievances that led to such a vile act. Government policy did not seek to punish an entire people or way of life. Regardless of which side an individual supports in the Middle East conflict, it is shocking that a teacher would openly side with one side, and it is equally shocking that his employers would allow that to happen.

Links:

https://stopantisemitism.org/08/20/middle-school-teacher-prominently-displays-palestine-flag-in-missouri-classroom/

https://defendinged.org/incidents/nipher-middle-school-social-studies-teacher-displays-palestinian-flag-in-classroom-refuses-to-display-israeli-flag/

https://stljewishlight.org/news/news-local/controversy-erupts-over-palestinian-flag-in-kirkwood-classroom-parent-raises-concern/

 

WHAT IS A SUPERINTENDENT WORTH?

Legislation was recently proposed in Missouri that would limit the salary of public school superintendents to no more than 5.5 times the minimum salary of a beginning teacher. According to the Fox news affiliate in Kansas City, the minimum salary for a first-year teacher in Missouri is $40,000.00. That means the highest salary a superintendent could earn under this bill sponsored by State Representative Ben Keathley (R) would be $220,000:    https://fox4kc.com/news/missouri-lawmaker-eyes-limits-on-school-superintendent-salaries/

Naturally, the Missouri Association of School Administrators opposes the bill (what else might one expect?). So we have to ask, does education improve when administrators--who generally do not teach a single class--get paid more? Most readers will surely be able to answer that question for themselves.

Interestingly, there is currently a shortage of superintendents, or at least a perceived shortage, despite the large salaries and generous benefit packages, golden parachutes and promises of an early retirement. The issues in American education have possibly discouraged applicants. But is the solution to that problem simply to throw yet more money into the hands of a few? Many communities already bestow salaries on their superintendents far in excess of the limits proposed in the Missouri legislature. Taxpayers might be surprised. The bottom line:  Are we receiving our money's worth?

WHO SHOULD CONTROL EDUCATION, AND TO WHAT EXTENT?

Question:  The U.S. Department of Education has added a new layer of bureaucracy to many aspects of education. It is difficult to argue that education has improved in the years since the Department was established. If the Department were to be abolished, then more control would be granted to states and local authorities. But would we then find ourselves in the position that each local authority might eventually develop vastly different curricula for core subjects? Books that are read and studied in Idaho might differ greatly from books that are studied in New York. Would we still be able to establish commonality in our shared heritage? Projecting further, could an engineer/doctor/teacher/researcher from one part of the country offer vastly different techniques and opinions than a counterpart raised in another area, and would that be a good thing, or not?

Local control is necessary in order to honor the freedom of stakeholders to chart their own destiny, but how do we ensure that knowledge and skills are properly inculcated?

 

ESTABLISHING COMPETENCE

Probably all of us have experienced meeting a "well-educated" person, laden with degrees, who somehow just doesn't seem to know what he/she is doing. And yes, many of those individuals can present glowing credentials, stellar recommendations and degrees from "prestigious" institutions. This brings us to the question:  Does the possession of a degree indicate competency in a given field? Sometimes yes, but clearly, sometimes no.

Sometimes, too, the completion of practicums, internships and such experiences as "practice teaching" fail to demonstrate the familiarity that we would expect. So how do we establish competency objectively? Should we rely on standardized testing--which also leads us to wonder if curriculum in a given field of study or profession should be standardized as well? Many grassroots educational reformers feel strongly that curriculum control should emanate from the local level (school board, local advisory committee, university department, etc.), but we then face the dilemma that varied curricula can lead to varied levels of competency.

And perhaps the basic question for our times might be:  Do we best help the underprivileged and underserved segments of our society by lowering standards, or by marshalling our resources so that the underprivileged gain the intellectual and critical thinking tools they need in order to demonstrate a uniform level of competency?

Many of us feel that education is currently in crisis in the U.S. and across the globe. For that reason, education will become a central topic on this blog in future posts, although not the sole topic. May we all live, learn and grow to the best of our abilities!